SOLAR BASICS · 2026

Solar Panel Types: Mono vs Poly vs Thin-Film

For a home in 2026 the answer is monocrystalline. Of the solar homes connected in SCE’s part of Los Angeles County in 2025 whose panel we could match to the state’s module list, 98.8% used mono panels, 1.2% polycrystalline and none thin-film. The typical panel was 405 W and 21.3% efficient, up from 255 W and 15.6% in 2015. The choice that is left is inside mono: standard panels around 21%, or premium heterojunction and n-type panels around 22–23% that also lose less power in heat.

Get a free estimate

Updated October 5, 2026 · Last fact-checked October 5, 2026 · By the Cali Energy team · Northridge, CA · CSLB #1032379 (B, C-10, C-39) — verify license

Solar Panel Types: Mono vs Poly vs Thin-Film
98.8%
Share of 2025 LA County solar homes (SCE) with monocrystalline panels, where the model could be matched
405 W
Typical panel on those homes in 2025, at 21.3% efficiency (CPUC × CEC data)
18.1%
Median efficiency of thin-film modules listed by the CEC since 2024, vs 22.2% for mono
KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Mono won: it went from 21% of matched LA installs in 2015 to 98.8% in 2025; polycrystalline fell from 79% to 1.2%.
  • Panels got bigger and better: the median model rose from 255 W at 15.6% efficiency to 405 W at 21.3%.
  • Thin-film is better than its reputation, but still not for roofs: recent listings run about 18%, so a 7 kW array needs about 23% more area than with mono.
  • Within mono, heat matters in LA: heterojunction panels lose about 0.24% of power per °C, standard ones about 0.34%.

What Los Angeles homes actually installed

The CPUC’s interconnection records list the panel model on each system, and the California Energy Commission’s PV Module List records each model’s technology, wattage and size. Matching the two for residential SCE customers in Los Angeles County:

Panel type and size on new LA County solar homes (SCE), by year
YearMonoPolyTypical panelTypical efficiencyMatched
201521.3%78.7%255 W15.6%19%
201762.0%37.9%290 W17.9%55%
201985.8%14.2%315 W19.4%69%
202198.2%1.8%340 W20.1%79%
202398.3%1.7%400 W20.8%79%
202598.8%1.2%405 W21.3%82%
2026 (Jan–Aug)98.6%1.4%410 W21.4%90%

Sources: California DG Stats (data through August 31, 2026) matched to the CEC PV Module List (October 1, 2026) by model number; “typical” is the median; shares are of matched systems; thin-film was 0.0% in every year. Efficiency = rated watts ÷ module area. Cali Energy count.

The three types today

Modules added to the CEC list since 2024
TypeModelsEfficiency (middle 80%)MedianArea for 7 kW
Monocrystalline5,30820.7–23.5%22.2%~340 sq ft
Thin-film (mostly CdTe)4916.9–19.3%18.1%~415 sq ft
Polycrystalline1———

Source: CEC PV Module List, models with a 2024–2026 listing date; area at the median efficiency. Cali Energy calculation.

Monocrystalline cells are cut from a single silicon crystal; they are black and the most efficient per square foot. Polycrystalline cells are cast from many crystals, look blue and speckled, and have all but disappeared: one new model listed in almost three years. Thin-film panels deposit a thin layer, usually cadmium telluride, on glass. The old “10–13%” figure is out of date — recent listings run about 18% — but that still means about 23% more area for the same power, and the products are built for large commercial and utility arrays. See the Department of Energy’s PV basics and NREL’s research-cell chart for where each technology stands in the lab.

The panels on LA roofs in 2025

Most-installed panel models, LA County solar homes (SCE), 2025
ModelHomesRatingEfficiencyPower loss per °CCell type
Qcells Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+1,544410 W21.5%-0.337%Standard
JA Solar JAM54S31-405/MR1,532405 W21.3%-0.329%Standard
LONGi LR5-54HABB-400M1,292400 W21.1%-0.342%Standard, bifacial glass-glass
REC Alpha Pure-RX (REC460AA)419460 W22.8%-0.248%Heterojunction (HJT)
Qcells Q.TRON BLK M-G2+245430 W22.8%-0.276%Premium line
REC Alpha Pure 2 (REC420AA)197420 W22.3%-0.234%Heterojunction (HJT)

Sources: DG Stats × CEC PV Module List (rating, area, temperature coefficient γPmax) · REC (heterojunction). Cali Energy count.

Every model in the table uses half-cut cells, which cut resistive losses and soften the effect of partial shade. The LONGi model is bifacial glass-glass, but on a flush-mounted roof the back face sees little light, so the front rating is what to plan on. For brands and warranties, see best solar panels for California and solar warranties explained.

PERC, TOPCon, heterojunction: the choice inside mono

PERC

The established p-type design: a passivated rear layer adds efficiency to a conventional cell.

TOPCon

A newer n-type cell with a tunnel-oxide contact. Early national-lab field data show a 1.3–1.8% first-year loss, with longer records still building (NLR).

Heterojunction (HJT)

Crystalline silicon layered with thin amorphous silicon. REC’s Alpha Pure-RX and Pure 2 use it, at 22.3–22.8% and the lowest heat losses in the table.

Back contact

All contacts on the rear, so nothing shades the front; used in some of the highest-efficiency residential panels.

Why heat matters on an LA roof

Panels are rated at a 25°C cell temperature, and on a summer roof cells run far hotter. Each degree costs a fixed share of power: about 0.34% for the standard panels above, 0.28% for Q.TRON and 0.23–0.25% for REC’s heterojunction panels. At a cell temperature of 65°C, 40 degrees above the rating, that is about 14% lost against about 10%. Inland valley roofs feel it most; see heat and solar output in LA and how panels age.

How to choose

Roof space

At about 20 W per sq ft, a 22.8% panel fits about 7% more power than a 21.3% one on a tight roof. See roof space for solar.

Heat

Compare the temperature coefficient on the datasheet: closer to zero is better on hot inland roofs.

Warranty

Product terms run 12–40 years by brand; check the year-25 output guarantee too.

The list

Check the model on the CEC PV Module List, which records its tested specifications.

Where to go next

Cali Energy installs monocrystalline panels in Los Angeles and can compare models for your roof, heat and budget. Call +1-323-844-7777 or ask for panel options — output figures are estimates, not guarantees.

Frequently asked

What are the main types of solar panels?

Monocrystalline, polycrystalline and thin-film. Mono is cut from a single silicon crystal and is the most efficient; poly is cast from many crystals and has nearly disappeared; thin-film deposits a thin layer, usually cadmium telluride, on glass and is used mainly in large arrays.

Which type of solar panel is best for a house?

Monocrystalline. It was on 98.8% of the 2025 Los Angeles County solar homes (SCE) whose panel model could be matched, because it puts the most power on a limited roof.

Are polycrystalline panels still sold?

Barely. Only one new polycrystalline model has been added to the California Energy Commission’s list since 2024, and poly made up 1.2% of matched LA installs in 2025.

How efficient is thin-film solar?

About 17–19% for modules listed by the CEC since 2024, median 18.1% — better than the old 10–13% figure, but below mono’s 22.2%, so it needs about 23% more area.

What’s the difference between PERC, TOPCon and HJT?

They are cell designs inside monocrystalline panels. PERC is the established p-type design; TOPCon is a newer n-type design now common in production; heterojunction layers amorphous silicon on crystalline silicon and loses less power in heat.

How efficient are residential solar panels in 2026?

The typical panel on LA homes in 2025 was 405 W and 21.3% efficient; mono models added to the CEC list since 2024 run 20.7–23.5% for the middle 80%.

Does LA heat change which panel I should choose?

It can. Standard panels lose about 0.34% of power per °C above 25°C, heterojunction panels about 0.24%; at 65°C that is about 14% vs 10%. The gap matters most on hot inland roofs.

Related reading

Sources & methodology

Choose panels that fit your roof and budget

Compare panel options for efficiency, heat performance and warranty on your roof. Estimates, not guarantees.

Get a free estimate

Prepared by Cali Energy, October 5, 2026. This article is for general educational purposes only and is not legal, tax, financial, engineering, or utility advice. Rates, incentives, codes, permit requirements, equipment specifications, prices, and program terms may change; figures and timelines are estimates, not guarantees. Confirm current requirements with the applicable utility, AHJ, program administrator, manufacturer, or a licensed professional. See our Content Disclaimer. Cali Energy · 19201 Parthenia St, Unit E, Northridge, CA 91324 · CSLB #1032379 (B, C-10, C-39)