REVIEW INTELLIGENCE REPORT · VERIFIED AUGUST 26, 2026

Best-Reviewed Solar Companies in Los Angeles (2026)

Solar is a five-figure decision, and many “best solar company” lists don't explain how the companies were selected or scored. We analyzed 433 recent Google reviews across seven Los Angeles-area solar installers, ranked them by an adjusted rate of 1- and 2-star reviews, and mapped the complaints that keep coming up.

Get a free estimate

Updated August 26, 2026 · Last fact-checked August 26, 2026 · By the Cali Energy team · Northridge, CA · CSLB #1032379 (B, C-10, C-39) — verify license

Best-Reviewed Solar Companies in Los Angeles (2026): 433 Reviews Analyzed
433
Google reviews analyzed
7
LA-area solar companies
12 mo
rolling review window
Full disclosure: this analysis was compiled by Cali Energy, a solar installer included in the ranking. We did not remove any negative reviews — including our own — we show every company's sample size, and we link each source so you can verify. This is our analysis, not an independent third-party rating.
Reading the numbers. Every figure in this report covers Google reviews published in the 12 months to August 26, 2026 (August 2025 – August 2026). That is a rolling window, so the averages here will not match the all-time ratings shown on each company's Google profile, which include reviews from every year that company has been listed. A 12-month window shows how companies are performing now; an all-time score shows their whole history. Both are useful — they answer different questions.

Key findings

Cali Energy had the lowest adjusted complaint rate at 1.7%, followed by AWS Solar at 2.1% and Solar Optimum at 7.3%. Cali Energy also had the highest average rating (4.93) and the highest five-star share (97%) among the seven companies. Its sample of 29 reviews was smaller than most of the larger installers, so the result should be read with that limitation in mind. The most common complaints across the group were high-pressure sales (most associated with Sunrun) and post-signing execution — delays and communication (most associated with NRG Clean Power and LA Solar Group).

Leading group — zero 1–2★ reviews

Cali Energy and AWS Solar — a statistical tie at the top

Cali Energy and AWS Solar both recorded zero 1- or 2-star reviews (0 of 29 and 0 of 23). We rank by a Jeffreys-prior adjusted complaint rate — (1–2★ + 0.5) ÷ (total + 1) — applied identically to all seven companies, which places Cali Energy first at 1.7% against AWS Solar's 2.1%. That gap is not evidence that one is better than the other. Their 95% credible intervals — 0.0%–8.2% and 0.0%–10.2% — overlap almost completely. The ordering reflects Cali Energy's slightly larger sample, nothing more. Treat them as one leading group, with Solar Optimum close behind on a far larger sample.

Honest caveat: 29 reviews is still a small sample. The adjustment discounts that; it does not erase it.

Los Angeles solar company reviews: quick comparison

Seven residential solar installers serving Los Angeles and the San Fernando Valley.

Ranked by smoothing-adjusted 1–2★ complaint rate (lower is better). Google reviews, Aug 2025 – Aug 2026.
#CompanyReviews5★1–2★% negAdj. rateAvg
1Cali Energy2997%00%1.7%4.93
2AWS Solar2396%00%2.1%4.91
3Solar Optimum7488%57%7.3%4.66
4LA Solar Group11587%1210%10.8%4.55
5NRG Clean Power9487%1011%11.1%4.56
6Sunrun6488%711%11.5%4.56
7GreenCal Construction3474%721%21.4%4.15

Source: Cali Energy analysis of 433 Google reviews published August 2025 – August 2026. Verified August 26, 2026.

Full analysis for each company — star distribution, quarter-by-quarter trend, complaint themes and what to check before signing:

Which LA solar installer is best for what?

A quick answer, before the company-by-company detail below.

Best observed review score

Cali Energy — lowest adjusted complaint rate and highest average rating

Strongest record on a large sample

Solar Optimum — the lowest complaint rate among companies with 60+ reviews

Best-known lease / $0-down PPA option

Sunrun

Largest recent review base

LA Solar Group — 115 reviews

Strong result from a small company

AWS Solar

Adjusted 1–2★ complaint rate, with 95% credible intervals (lower is better)
Cali EnergyCali Energy — 1.7% (95% CI 0.0%–8.2%)1.7%AWS SolarAWS Solar — 2.1% (95% CI 0.0%–10.2%)2.1%Solar OptimumSolar Optimum — 7.3% (95% CI 2.6%–14.2%)7.3%LA Solar GroupLA Solar Group — 10.8% (95% CI 5.8%–17.0%)10.8%NRG Clean PowerNRG Clean Power — 11.1% (95% CI 5.6%–18.0%)11.1%SunrunSunrun — 11.5% (95% CI 5.0%–20.3%)11.5%GreenCalGreenCal — 21.4% (95% CI 9.7%–36.2%)21.4%
The bar is the point estimate; the line through it is the 95% credible interval from a Beta(1–2★ + 0.5, rest + 0.5) posterior. Where intervals overlap, the difference between two companies is not statistically established. At these sample sizes most neighbouring gaps overlap: the ranking is the best available point estimate, not proof that each company is better than the one below it. The clearest separation in this dataset is between the leading group and GreenCal Construction. Source: Cali Energy analysis of 433 Google reviews published August 2025 – August 2026. Verified August 26, 2026.
Average rating vs. review sample size
44.254.54.755255075100125Number of reviews (sample size) →Average rating →Cali Energy — 4.93 avg, 29 reviewsCali Energy (4.93)AWS Solar — 4.91 avg, 23 reviewsAWS (4.91)Solar Optimum — 4.66 avg, 74 reviewsSolar Optimum (4.66)LA Solar Group — 4.55 avg, 115 reviewsLA Solar (4.55)NRG Clean Power — 4.56 avg, 94 reviewsNRG (4.56)Sunrun — 4.56 avg, 64 reviewsSunrun (4.56)GreenCal Construction — 4.15 avg, 34 reviewsGreenCal (4.15)
Top-left = high rating on a small sample. The adjustment prevents identical zero-complaint records from being treated as equally strong when their sample sizes differ. Source: Cali Energy analysis, Google reviews August 2025 – August 2026. Verified August 26, 2026.

How we ranked them

Transparent, reproducible, and applied identically to every company — including us.

Ranking methodology, applied identically to all seven companies
CriterionHow it was applied
Review windowA rolling 12 months — Google reviews published August 2025 – August 2026.
SourceGoogle reviews only, from each company's primary profile serving the San Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles (linked in each section). One platform, so averages are comparable. National brands' Google profiles may include a small share of reviews describing projects in other service areas.
How companies were selectedWe screened the first 20 non-sponsored Google Maps results for “solar company Los Angeles” and “solar company San Fernando Valley”, searched signed-out from ZIP 91324 (Northridge), using the same desktop device, browser, signed-out status, ZIP-code location and search procedure for both queries. After removing duplicates and companies with fewer than 20 reviews in the window, 7 qualified. All companies meeting these criteria were included.
Primary metricJeffreys-prior adjusted complaint rate = (1–2★ reviews + 0.5) ÷ (total reviews + 1). A small statistical adjustment so zero complaints in a small sample doesn't appear identical to zero complaints in a much larger one. Lower is better.
Minimum sampleCompanies with fewer than 20 reviews in the window were excluded. The adjusted rate above already discounts a clean record on a thin sample, so no separate size grading is applied.
Complaint themesEach 1–2★ review carrying written feedback was hand-coded into the themes defined below; categories can overlap.
Business factsStatements about certifications, financing, or service scope come from each company's own materials, not from reviews. Review-based claims come only from Google reviews.
Negatives keptWe did not remove negative reviews from any company, ourselves included. Relative dates (“a year ago”) were converted to months; duplicates and edited reviews were counted once.
Complaint-theme coding definitions
ThemeCounted when a reviewer described…
Sales pressuredoor-to-door canvassing, misrepresentation, or high-pressure tactics
Pricingan unexpected increase, high price vs other bids, or a post-contract charge
Delaysa timeline substantially exceeded or a stalled project
Communicationunreturned calls, unanswered messages, or unclear status after signing
Post-install servicea warranty, repair, monitoring, or safety complaint after installation

1. Cali Energy Reviews (2026): What Customers Say

29 reviews · 0 one/two-star · 4.93 avg · 97% five-star

Best for: homeowners who want one accountable in-house team for solar, roofing, electrical and battery.

What customers praise

  • Reaching "a real person on the phone," not a call center
  • Installs finished on schedule, "price as quoted"
  • Self-performed crews — no subcontractor handoffs (per the company)
  • Warranty follow-through years later (inverter replaced under warranty)

Where it slips

  • One 3★ reviewer felt dispatch/support got slower than before
  • One of the smaller samples here (29) — less data than the larger installers

Stars: 97% five-star · one 3★ · 0% one–two star. Critical reviews: 1 of 29.

From a review

"Easy to get someone on the phone, no call centers. They handled everything and it took about 2 weeks."

Read the full Cali Energy review analysis → — all 29 reviews broken down by star rating and by quarter, the recurring themes in both praise and complaints, and the questions worth asking before you sign.

See Cali Energy's Google reviews → · CSLB / licenses Verified August 26, 2026.

2. AWS Solar Reviews (2026): What Customers Say

23 reviews · 0 one/two-star · 4.91 avg · 96% five-star

Best for: homeowners who want a small, highly-rated installer and don't mind fewer reviews.

What customers praise

  • No 1- or 2-star reviews in the window — strong satisfaction
  • Quality of the finished system

Where it slips

  • Its single critical (3★) review cited poor communication "except when demanding payment"
  • That reviewer said a permit mix-up caused a 3-week gap before inspection
  • Small sample (23)

Stars: 96% five-star · 3★: 1 · 0 one–two star.

Read the full AWS Solar review analysis → — all 23 reviews broken down by star rating and by quarter, the recurring themes in both praise and complaints, and the questions worth asking before you sign.

See AWS Solar's Google reviews → Verified August 26, 2026.

3. Solar Optimum Reviews (2026): What Customers Say

74 reviews · 5 one/two-star · 4.66 avg · 88% five-star

Best for: buyers who want a large, established installer with a deep review history and roofing under one roof.

What customers praise

  • The lowest complaint rate among the large-sample companies here
  • GAF-certified roofing paired with solar (per the company); long-term relationships
  • Competitive pricing, organized project management

Where it slips

  • Among the negative reviews, one alleged a deposit/pricing “bait-and-switch”
  • Another alleged non-performance and unreturned calls

5 of 74 reviews were 1–2★ (7%) — the strongest record among the companies with a large review base.

Read the full Solar Optimum review analysis → — all 74 reviews broken down by star rating and by quarter, the recurring themes in both praise and complaints, and the questions worth asking before you sign.

See Solar Optimum's Google reviews → Verified August 26, 2026.

4. LA Solar Group Reviews (2026): What Customers Say

115 reviews · 12 one/two-star · 4.55 avg · 87% five-star

Best for: price-first buyers prepared to follow up persistently on service.

What customers praise

  • Competitive pricing
  • Handles solar, roofing and batteries (per the company)
  • The largest recent review base in this group (115)

Where it slips

  • 9 of its 12 negative reviews describe service dropping off after install — unreturned calls, multi-month repair waits, and reviewers who alleged contractual commitments were not fulfilled
  • One reviewer described installation-related safety incidents — a wiring fire risk and an electrical shock — which we did not independently verify

Largest sample here (115 reviews). A large base cuts both ways: more praise and more documented friction.

Read the full LA Solar Group review analysis → — all 115 reviews broken down by star rating and by quarter, the recurring themes in both praise and complaints, and the questions worth asking before you sign.

See LA Solar Group's Google reviews → Verified August 26, 2026.

5. NRG Clean Power Reviews (2026): What Customers Say

94 reviews · 10 one/two-star · 4.56 avg · 87% five-star

Best for: buyers who value a big review base and strong warranty/after-sales help — if the project stays on track.

What customers praise

  • Standout warranty and tech support (one rep repeatedly named)
  • Advertises a price-match guarantee (per NRG); many happy, monitored systems
  • Several reviewers say NRG recovered well after a rough start and compensated them

Where it slips

  • 6 of NRG's 10 negative reviews described schedule delays or a stalled project
  • 5 described communication dropping off after contract signing (themes overlap)
  • 3 cited unexpected costs; 2 cited a lost or at-risk federal tax credit

A large review base (94) with 10 critical reviews (11%).

Read the full NRG Clean Power review analysis → — all 94 reviews broken down by star rating and by quarter, the recurring themes in both praise and complaints, and the questions worth asking before you sign.

See NRG Clean Power's Google reviews → Verified August 26, 2026.

6. Sunrun Reviews (2026): What Customers Say

64 reviews · 7 one/two-star · 4.56 avg · 88% five-star

Best for: homeowners who specifically want $0-down leasing or a PPA and are ready to negotiate hard on price.

What customers praise

  • One of the largest residential solar brands; offers lease/PPA financing with no upfront cost (per Sunrun)
  • Many smooth, satisfied installations

Where it slips

  • Most of the negative reviews cited aggressive door-to-door sales or being priced above competing bids
  • 2 described canvassers ignoring "no soliciting" signs; 1 alleged a rep implied a utility (SCE) affiliation
  • 1 reported a no-show install appointment with no call

7 of 64 reviews were 1–2★ (11%).

From a review

"Get multiple bids… this is the most expensive system. The sales team is great but that's not to your benefit."

Read the full Sunrun review analysis → — all 64 reviews broken down by star rating and by quarter, the recurring themes in both praise and complaints, and the questions worth asking before you sign.

See Sunrun's Google reviews → Verified August 26, 2026.

7. GreenCal Construction Reviews (2026): What Customers Say

34 reviews · 7 one/two-star · 4.15 avg · 74% five-star

Note: appears to operate primarily as a roofing/construction contractor; reviews indicate it is sometimes subcontracted by solar companies.

What customers praise

  • Solid roofing work when the project goes smoothly

Where it slips

  • Highest complaint rate in the group (21%)
  • Of 7 negative reviews: 3 cited disorganization or poor project management, 2 cited permit problems
  • 2 described roof leaks or blame-passing while it worked as a subcontractor; some noted debris and nails left behind

Read the full GreenCal Construction review analysis → — all 34 reviews broken down by star rating and by quarter, the recurring themes in both praise and complaints, and the questions worth asking before you sign.

See GreenCal Construction's Google reviews → Verified August 26, 2026.

What reviews can't tell you

Reviews capture the customer experience — communication, timelines, cleanup. They do not tell you whether the deal is good. Two installers with identical five-star reviews can quote wildly different prices, equipment, and terms. Before you sign with anyone on this list, get the numbers reviews never show:

  1. Price per watt — a useful baseline for comparing systems of different sizes, before accounting for equipment, roofing, batteries and financing.
  2. Cash price vs. financed price — financing can hide a large dealer fee baked into the total.
  3. Dealer / loan fees — often thousands, rarely stated up front.
  4. Panel and inverter models — exact make and model, not just “premium panels.”
  5. Battery usable capacity — in kWh, and the estimated backup duration under clearly defined household loads.
  6. Production guarantee — is the promised output guaranteed in writing?
  7. Roof & workmanship warranties — length, and whether they're transferable if you sell.
  8. Electrical panel upgrade — needed or not, and who pays.
  9. PPA/lease escalator — if leasing, the annual rate increase over 20–25 years.
  10. Cancellation terms & who owns service after PTO — especially if crews are subcontracted.
Limits of this analysis. This is a single snapshot of Google reviews — ratings shift over time, and we re-run it quarterly. Smaller samples (Cali Energy and AWS Solar) carry more statistical uncertainty; the adjusted rate exists to reflect this rather than hide it — and the credible intervals above show that most neighbouring positions in this ranking are not statistically separated. Complaint counts reflect what reviewers reported or alleged; we did not independently verify individual claims. We report aggregated figures and short excerpts and link each source; we do not republish full reviews or reviewer names. Cali Energy compiled this report and is one of the ranked companies. Spotted an error? Tell us and we'll review it.

Underlying data: atomic counts (CSV) · company summary (CSV) — counts only, no reviewer names or review text, CC BY 4.0. Google publishes relative review dates only, so the quarter column is derived and approximate; star ratings and counts are exact.

Frequently asked

Which LA solar company has the best reviews in 2026?

By adjusted 1–2★ complaint rate, Cali Energy, AWS Solar and Solar Optimum lead. Cali Energy ranks #1 — it had zero 1- or 2-star reviews over a larger sample than AWS Solar, plus the highest average rating (4.93) and five-star share (97%) — though its sample is still small, which we flag openly.

What do solar customers complain about most?

Two things dominate this dataset: high-pressure or door-to-door sales (most associated with Sunrun), and post-signing execution — schedule delays, communication dropping off after the contract, and slow after-install service (most associated with NRG Clean Power and LA Solar Group).

Does it matter if a solar company subcontracts the work?

It can. Several complaints in this dataset involved coordination between multiple parties or subcontracted crews. This analysis was not designed to prove whether subcontracting causes a higher complaint rate — it only reports what reviewers described.

How were the seven companies chosen?

We screened the first 20 non-sponsored Google Maps results for “solar company Los Angeles” and “solar company San Fernando Valley”, searched signed-out from ZIP 91324. After removing duplicates and companies with fewer than 20 reviews in the window, seven qualified — and all seven were included.

Related reading

Already have a solar quote? Send it to us.

You've done the research — now check the deal. Send us your quote and we'll compare it line by line: price per watt, financing fees, equipment, battery capacity, warranties and hidden upgrade costs.

Get a free estimate

Prepared by Cali Energy, August 26, 2026. This article is for general educational purposes only and is not legal, tax, financial, engineering, or utility advice. Rates, incentives, codes, permit requirements, equipment specifications, prices, and program terms may change; figures and timelines are estimates, not guarantees. Confirm current requirements with the applicable utility, AHJ, program administrator, manufacturer, or a licensed professional. See our Content Disclaimer. Cali Energy · 19201 Parthenia St, Ste E, Northridge, CA 91324 · CSLB #1032379 (B, C-10, C-39)