Cali Energy research · Simi Valley, ZIP codes 93063 and 93065 · SCE

How much do solar panels produce in Simi Valley?

Cali Energy measured five solar systems it installed in Simi Valley ZIP codes 93063 and 93065, which also take in unincorporated parts of Ventura County: in 2023–2025 their panels produced a median of 1,469 kWh per kilowatt a year. That is 5% more than the 116 systems it monitors in the San Fernando Valley and Burbank, at 1,397, but the 95% interval for the gap, −9% to +8%, includes zero, so this sample does not establish a difference. For illustration, that median applied to a 5.6 kW system, the typical size among the five, gives about 8,200 kWh a year.

Updated October 20, 2026 · Data through December 2025 · Cali Energy research team · CSLB #1032379 · verify license

1,469
kWh per kW a year, median of the five monitored Simi Valley systems, 2023–2025
+5%
Against 116 monitored systems in the San Fernando Valley and Burbank (95% interval −9% to +8%, which includes zero)
1,377–1,469
The middle half of the five systems, kWh per kW a year
160 · 76
kWh per kW in July and in December

Month by month

Median kWh per kW of panels in each month, 2023–2025: 13 Simi Valley system-years, 253 in the San Fernando Valley and Burbank.

Simi Valley against the San Fernando Valley, kWh per kW by month
Simi ValleySan Fernando Valley and Burbank
Monthly solar output per kW, Simi Valley and the San Fernando Valley, 2023 to 2025Simi Valley: 160 kWh per kW in July, 76 in December; the San Fernando Valley: 159 and 70.05010015020086Jan89Feb121Mar146Apr142May147Jun160Jul145Aug113Sep103Oct77Nov76Dec
Bars: Simi Valley. Line: the San Fernando Valley and Burbank. Monthly medians do not add up to the annual median.
Monthly output per kW, Simi Valley and the San Fernando Valley, 2023–2025
MonthSimi Valley, kWh per kWSan Fernando Valley and BurbankDifference
January86.379.7+8%
February89.286.9+3%
March120.6120.30%
April145.8143.0+2%
May141.8140.6+1%
June147.0146.40%
July160.5158.9+1%
August144.8144.90%
September113.0115.8−2%
October103.4108.4−5%
November76.877.9−1%
December76.570.4+9%

Against the San Fernando Valley, the monitored Simi Valley systems made more in six months, less in September, October and November and about the same in March, June and August; the differences ran from −5% in October to +9% in December. July was the best month at 160 kWh per kW; December, at 76, gave 48% of July.

Seasonal shares differed modestly: May to July brought 32.6% of a Simi Valley system’s year and December to February 17.7%, against 32.3% and 17.1% in the San Fernando Valley.

By system age

All five Simi Valley systems were installed in 2021 or later. Against the 79 systems of that age in the San Fernando Valley, at 1,383, the difference is +6%, in line with the overall result.

Year by year

kWh per kW of panels, systems with a full year. Each year counts only the systems with a full year, so the yearly medians and the all-years median above come from different sets of systems. 2023 and 2025 had fewer than five Simi Valley systems with a full year and are not shown.

Simi Valley and the San Fernando Valley by year
YearSimi Valley: systems · middle half · medianSan Fernando Valley and Burbank: systems · median
20245 · 1,350–1,442 · 1,41989 · 1,379

Simi Valley and the San Fernando Valley

San Fernando Valley places with five or more Cali Energy systems with full years, 2023–2025, and Simi Valley for comparison.

Observed output in Cali Energy’s monitored samples, 2023–2025
PlaceMonitored systemsMedian kWh per kW a year
Porter Ranch191,524
Simi Valley51,469
Northridge101,425
Woodland Hills81,412
Winnetka51,382
Chatsworth61,350
North Hills61,297
North Hollywood101,294
Tarzana51,290
Valley Glen51,282
Encino51,223
Each row is the median of Cali Energy’s own installations in that place: not a random sample, not adjusted for roof direction, tilt or shade, and not a ranking of places. The 95% intervals on these pages are computed for each place separately, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Solar production by area.

For a Simi Valley homeowner

Annual energy-equivalent size. Dividing a year’s electricity use by about 1,470 gives the kilowatts of panels whose 2023–2025 output would have matched it on these systems: 10,000 kWh a year comes to about 6.8 kW. The roof, future load and the tariff decide the actual size.

Checking your own system. Compare your system’s median full year over 2023–2025 with the middle half of the monitored Simi Valley systems, 1,377–1,469 kWh per kW. For 2024 alone, use 1,350–1,442. A figure below the range is a prompt to look at shade, soiling and monitoring, not a diagnosis. See monthly production in Los Angeles.

The utility. Simi Valley is served by Southern California Edison, so its rooftop systems connect to SCE. Solar with SCE.

Installations here. Our Simi Valley projects.

Methodology

Sample
Solar systems in ZIP codes 93063 and 93065 installed and monitored by Cali Energy, on SolarEdge or Enphase monitoring: five systems, installed from 2021 to 2022, 5.2 to 12.8 kW DC in the middle half. The sample is drawn by ZIP code, not by the city boundary, and both ZIP codes also take in unincorporated parts of Ventura County.
Comparison
The San Fernando Valley figure covers Cali Energy systems in the Valley and Burbank ZIP codes, 116 systems; Simi Valley is not part of it.
Years
Full calendar years 2023–2025 with all twelve months reporting, under the rules of the platform comparison.
Downtime
Each system’s benchmark is the median of its full years 2019–2025; a 2023–2025 year below 75% of it counts as downtime and is left out. None of the Simi Valley years were, and 3 of 256 in the San Fernando Valley; without the rule the medians are 1,469 and 1,397.
Output
kWh per kW of DC panel capacity. Each system’s figure is the median of its full years; a place’s figure is the median across its systems. Across all 257 systems on real-world solar production in Los Angeles the same method gives 1,382; that page’s headline 1,386 is the median of their 569 system-years. Months are medians of all system-months.
Interval
95% interval of the gap from 4,000 bootstrap resamples of systems, each system keeping its years together. Each place’s interval is computed on its own, without adjustment for comparing several places.
Threshold
Figures for fewer than five systems are not published.
How to cite: Cali Energy, “How much do solar panels produce in Simi Valley?,” updated October 20, 2026, https://cali-energy.com/research/cities/simi-valley. Aggregated data are free to use under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page.

Frequently asked questions

How much electricity do solar panels produce in Simi Valley?

On the five Simi Valley systems Cali Energy monitors, a median of 1,469 kWh per kW of panels a year in 2023–2025. For illustration, that median applied to a 5.6 kW system, the typical size among them, gives about 8,200 kWh a year.

How do the monitored Simi Valley systems compare with the San Fernando Valley?

Not clearly. In 2023–2025 the five Simi Valley systems Cali Energy monitors produced a median 5% more per kW than its 116 systems in the San Fernando Valley and Burbank, but the 95% interval for the gap, −9% to +8%, includes zero, so this sample does not establish a difference.

What is the best month for solar in Simi Valley?

On the monitored Simi Valley systems, July, at a median of 160 kWh per kW; December was the lowest at 76, 48% of July.

Who measured these systems?

Cali Energy, a licensed solar contractor based in Northridge (CSLB #1032379), which installed and monitors them; the method is set out above.

More research

Next steps

Planning solar in Simi Valley?

Prepared by Cali Energy, October 20, 2026. Figures describe systems in our monitoring fleet and are not a guarantee of what any specific roof will produce; orientation, tilt, shade, equipment and weather change results. Not engineering, financial or utility advice. See our Content Disclaimer.