SCE and PG&E rate filings: what’s pending for 2026–2027
On their own Q2 2026 filings to the CPUC, SCE’s residential average rate falls to 30.85¢/kWh by end-2027 while PG&E’s rises to 35.14¢ — the two largest utilities moving in opposite directions. Below: the proceedings each has pending, the rate effect each utility projects, and what this snapshot does not contain.

Quick answer
- Last updated August 17, 2026, from the utilities’ Q2 2026 filings to the CPUC. Next update expected when Q3 2026 filings publish.
- SCE and PG&E are moving in opposite directions. On their own submitted figures, SCE’s residential average rate falls to 30.85¢/kWh by end-2027 while PG&E’s rises to 35.14¢.
- PG&E’s largest pending item is the 2027 GRC Phase 1, an annual revenue requirement of about $11.7 billion.
- Everything below is what the utility filed, not what the CPUC approved. Pending requests are frequently reduced.
- For the causes behind a decade of increases rather than the current filings, see our guide to why SCE rates are high.
How to read this tracker
Every California investor-owned utility files a Cost and Rate Tracking Tool with the CPUC each quarter, under Ordering Paragraph 4 of decision D.22-08-023. Those filings separate authorized revenue requirements from pending ones and show what each would do to rates and to a typical bill.
That is the source for this page. Scope and limits, stated up front: this edition covers SCE and PG&E only — SDG&E files on the same schedule and is not yet included — and it is a quarterly snapshot of the Q2 2026 filings, not a live feed. It lists named proceedings, the years they affect, and the rate effect each utility projects. It does not currently carry decision dates, effective dates or a per-proceeding bill impact, because those are not in the summary sheets we read. Three cautions travel with every number here:
- Filed is not approved. These are the utilities’ own submissions. The CPUC routinely authorises less than requested.
- Year-end and current-year figures are different bases. Where we compare utilities we use the same basis for both.
- Illustrative bills use fixed assumptions. SCE’s residential figures below assume Schedule D, Basic, single family, baseline region 9 warm, 500 kWh a month, with the California Climate Credit included.
Source: CPUC — Quarterly Revenue Request Reports, Q2 2026 filings for SCE and PG&E. Verified August 17, 2026.
SCE: pending proceedings
| Utility | Proceeding | Years affected |
|---|---|---|
| SCE | 2027 ERRA Forecast | 2027 |
| SCE | 2024 ERRA Review | 2027 |
| SCE | 2025 ERRA Review | 2028 |
| SCE | NextGen (A.25-03-009) | 2026–2030 |
| SCE | IQP 2027 Bridge Funding | 2027 |
| SCE | 2024 WMCE | 2027 |
| SCE | Diablo Canyon Extended Operations NBC | 2027 |
| SCE | 2024/2025 TAMA Balance | 2027 |
| SCE | IQP 2028-2033 Application | 2028–2030 |
| SCE | EE 2028-2035 Application | 2028–2030 |
| SCE | AMI 2.0 | 2028–2030 |
| SCE | Section 851 — Hydroelectric TULE / North Coast / Ontario Easements | 2027 |
From SCE’s Q2 2026 Cost and Rate Tracking Tool, “Summary” sheet. Status: filed / pending, not approved.
SCE: what those filings do to rates and bills
| Basis | ¢/kWh |
|---|---|
| Rates effective January 1, 2026 | 33.190 |
| Rates effective June 1, 2026 | 33.160 |
| 2026 authorized | 32.258 |
| 2026 including all pending requests | 32.265 |
| Customer group | Jan 1, 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 | 2026 authorized | With pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-CARE | $187.26 | $187.10 | $181.42 | $181.46 |
| CARE | $105.18 | $105.05 | $101.52 | $101.54 |
Two things stand out. The 2026 authorized rate is 2.8% below the rate that took effect on January 1, so on SCE’s own numbers this is a year of slight decline rather than increase. And the gap between “authorized” and “with all pending granted in full” is 0.02% — the pending items in this particular quarter are small relative to the base.
PG&E: pending proceedings
| Proceeding | Subject | Annual revenue requirement ($000) |
|---|---|---|
| A.25-05-009 | 2027 GRC Phase 1 | $11,716,451 |
| A.24-11-009 | 2024 WMCE | $170,072 |
| A.25-11-001 | Kincade and Dixie AB1054 Wildfire Cost Review and Recovery | $8,341 |
From PG&E’s Q2 2026 Cost and Rate Tracking Tool, “Selected Data” sheet. Status: filed / pending.
The 2027 General Rate Case Phase 1 dominates everything else on the list by roughly two orders of magnitude. If you follow only one California rate proceeding into 2027, that is the one.
The divergence worth watching
| Year | SCE | PG&E |
|---|---|---|
| End 2025 | — | 35.044 |
| End 2026 | 32.265 | 32.358 |
| End 2027 | 30.850 | 35.136 |
| End 2028 | 31.128 | — |
| End 2029 | 31.478 | — |
Compared on the same basis — year-end, with all pending requests granted — the two largest utilities finish 2026 within a tenth of a cent of each other and then separate. On their own filings, SCE trends down through 2027 while PG&E trends up by roughly 8.6% over the same period.
This is a comparison we computed from the two filings; neither utility presents it. Treat it as a signal about what is queued in each territory, not as a forecast of what customers will pay — the CPUC has not ruled on these requests.
The decade behind the current filings
Quarterly filings are a narrow window. For scale, the CPUC’s Public Advocates Office reports that residential average rates rose 101% at SCE, 97% at SDG&E and 69% at PG&E between January 2016 and June 2026. Measured from 2014 the increases are 117% at SDG&E, 97% at SCE and 93% at PG&E, against consumer price inflation of 42%.
The same office names the primary statewide drivers: wildfire mitigation and wildfire liability costs, transmission and distribution investment, and rooftop solar incentives. Wildfire-related revenue requirements alone reached $3.97 billion at PG&E (19% of its total), $2.69 billion at SCE (14%) and $676 million at SDG&E (14%) as of January 2026.
Source: Public Advocates Office at the CPUC — Q2 2026 Electric Rates Report (July 2026), slides 5, 9 and 11.
What this page cannot determine
- What the CPUC will approve. Every pending figure here is a request. Authorised amounts are frequently lower.
- Your rate. These are bundled residential averages on fixed assumptions, not your rate plan, baseline region or usage.
- Timing within a year. Rate changes take effect on specific dates set by decision; annual averages hide that.
- Municipal utilities. LADWP, SMUD and other municipals do not file with the CPUC and are not in this tracker.
Frequently asked
Are California electricity rates going up in 2026?
Not uniformly — the two largest utilities diverge. On their own Q2 2026 filings, SCE’s 2026 authorized residential average rate of 32.26¢/kWh is about 2.8% below its January 1, 2026 rate, while PG&E projects a rise from 32.34¢ in 2026 to 35.14¢ by end-2027. These are utility submissions, not CPUC decisions.
What is the biggest pending rate case in California?
By revenue requirement, PG&E’s 2027 General Rate Case Phase 1 (A.25-05-009), at roughly $11.7 billion annually — about two orders of magnitude larger than the other proceedings PG&E listed with affordability metrics in its Q2 2026 filing.
Where does this tracker get its data?
From the Cost and Rate Tracking Tool filings each investor-owned utility submits to the CPUC quarterly under Ordering Paragraph 4 of D.22-08-023, supplemented by the Public Advocates Office quarterly rate report. We read the Q2 2026 spreadsheets directly rather than relying on summaries.
Does “pending” mean the increase will happen?
No. Pending means the utility has requested it. The CPUC frequently authorises less than requested, and timing can shift. That is why this page separates authorized from pending rather than presenting one number.
Is LADWP included?
No. LADWP is a municipal utility and does not file with the CPUC, so it appears in no part of this tracker. The same applies to SMUD and other municipals.
How often is this page updated?
It follows the CPUC quarterly filing cycle. This edition is a snapshot of the Q2 2026 filings, verified August 17, 2026, and covers SCE and PG&E only. SDG&E files on the same schedule and is not yet included.
Related reading
Sources & methodology
Figures on this page come from the primary sources below and, where noted, from Cali Energy calculations using the stated assumptions. Rates, incentives, and program terms change; each was verified August 17, 2026.
About this reference
Cali Energy is a licensed California contractor (CSLB #1032379) in Northridge. We publish this page as a reference and date it to the day each figure was checked against its source.
Prepared by Cali Energy, August 17, 2026. This article is for general educational purposes only and is not legal, tax, financial, engineering, or utility advice. Rates, incentives, codes, permit requirements, equipment specifications, prices, and program terms may change; figures and timelines are estimates, not guarantees. Confirm current requirements with the applicable utility, AHJ, program administrator, manufacturer, or a licensed professional. See our Content Disclaimer. Cali Energy · 19201 Parthenia St, Ste E, Northridge, CA 91324 · CSLB #1032379 (B, C-10, C-39)